All’s Fair in Love and AIG WAR? No Ethics ?
Posted by defensebaseactcomp on March 14, 2012
Defense Base Act Claimants really are in another War Zone when they must file a DBA Claim.
As it turns out many, too many, of the Plaintiff’s own Attorneys are aiding and abetting the enemy
Last January ALJ Berlin awarded the Dill Widow DBA Death Benefits in a very important PTSD/Suicide Claim.
This claim was denied for five years while Wade Dill’s widow Barbara’s integrity was brutally attacked as though she had pulled the trigger herself.
KBR refused to supply Wade Dill’s medical records and other reports which would have exposed the state of mind he was in while still in Iraq. But it is OK to defy discovery if you are AIG/KBR-SEII. Do not try this yourself, you’ll lose your claim.
Dennis Nalick was the Attorney who brought this claim to a successful decision.
Barbara Dill’s next Attorney, Bruce H Nicholson, refused to address misinformation in the records saying “you won the claim why would you want to mess with it”.
Mr Nicholson refuted any suggestion that this very important decision would be appealed. He went so far as to tell the Widow that she should discontinue corresponding with those who assured her it would be. Bad people we are, just trying to upset her needlessly.
AIG KBR SEII via Michael Thomas appealed the decision.
Mr Nicholson never responded to the Benefits Review Board on behalf of the Widow though he assured her he was on top of it and he and the widow corresponded regularly.
On February 28 the BRB overturned the ALJ’s decision, unopposed. The widow was not represented at all.
Mr. Nicholson was though, prior to this decision, negotiating a “settlement” with Michael Thomas and AIG which would take this important PTSD Suicide decision out of this WAR as case law for all impending and future PTSD Suicide claims. The same Mr Nicholson who posted here at the blog in response to the award:
“The decision represents a sound road map for work related contractor suicide claims and is unlikely to be overturned when followed.”
We ask, is no one in this wretched biased system held to any standard of ethical practice?
Mr Nicholson was responsible for representing the Widow and he did not.
Would it not have been a requirement of those who were involved in this to make the widow aware, to speak up?
We do not kid ourselves that this was simply a case of friendly fire. There was too much at stake here.